Skip to main content

Kubernetes vx Docker (FAIL)

I was watching this video...


it shares a lot of interesting information but is wrong from the start. First of all it does not consider the business and cost side of development and that's a common problem for programmers. Being IBM I was not expecting that.

However,
docker and kubernetes are apples and oranges. While k8s might be a good choice for container orchestration you should not make this comparison.... docker swarm is a simple transition to scale without the upfront complexity of k8s. ALSO there is a development cost with k8s that you may or may not recover.... what happens if you spend that extra cash on a k8s installation and the volume never arrives? Lastly you've simply waved your hands at the DB and API servers... you cannot just throw any number of java database adapters at the problem and expect great performance. There are limits to the other components.... you have to scale that too. IBM certainly know it's stuff but this is a bad article.
One other thing... While k8s does "work" with docker it really wants to manage containerd. And while docker does,  sort of, operate in this environment there are still other challenges.

One glaring hole that most designers do not discuss is exactly what should be in a container. A container can be as simple as a single executable and some supporting files to a complete operating system and your application. For example "helloworld" is built on top of the docker Scratch container which is an empty container. The application is executed in the docker sandbox and then exits. If the application needs or is built with an OS like Alpine then all the daemons and drivers need to be loaded. That can and will take cycles from the host. It's not like the guests will be idle while waiting for work. At that point it's not much different from a VMware installation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

Agile is still dead and has been since 1991

[updated 2011.09.30] yet another response to Agile is good.
When you have so much of you career invested in something like Agile, XP etc... it can be hard to see the forest for the trees. I had a consulting job in The Haag many years ago. IBM was the incumbent contractor at the customer site (a bank) but after 5 years on the job they had not written a single line of functioning code. In the office there were two teams of software people... both behind closed doors. The first team was the Data team and the second team was Functional. They rarely spoke and they never shared information. I was there for a week, introduced the client to OO and we had a functioning prototype. Smart people do smart things, You cannot make an underachiever exceptional by using Agile. Either they get "it" or they don't.
I just commented on a blog. I'm sure there is some validity to his post beyond observing that Agile Scrum is broken. It certainly is not what it was originally intended but for…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…