Skip to main content

Ubiquiti Edgerouter or Netgate pfSense

The average home user should just use the ISPs defacto services. The price is typically reasonable including warranty and support. Simple economics should provide the realization that once you start to add hardware you add to the amount of training, support, attack vectors, and so on.
How many times have you called your ISP for support and they want you to connect directly to the modem, bypassing your router, and test whatever it is you are reporting? For me it's every time.
But once you start to live a mobile or semi-mobile lifestyle you either have to move certain elements into the cloud, everything to the client site, or at home. The first 2 are obvious and the client site is the easiest because you're not likely managing that service making daily life easy. I prefer to function in the cloud but it does leave some systems vulnerable. And phoning home has it's own set of vulnerabilities.

One client is in a constant state of change. It's impossible for me to deploy a dev in a box approach.

One client uses cloud and bare metal services to process millions of phone calls a day. These systems are so busy that the various systems including hardware are reaching EOL.

Another client has a cloud based app that is rock solid but is rarely used. One thing we talk about in risk management is not to create risk when there is none. So this stuff is just aging.

The last client I will mention had to replace my MacBook while I was traveling because it failed in a spectacular way. The battery expanded causing the mouse to stop working. At the time I had all of my projects on the Mac's HDD. That meant my latest changes could be lost or if the laptop was stolen then I could be responsible for the company's secrets. Later that year I started encrypting everything.

So assuming that you're going to commute to the cloud now the question is how? What is he formula for your services. To VPN or not to VPN; or maybe just ssh? Running an ssh server is pretty simple and it limits the attack plane even though it's a thin layer. VPN can open the barn door entirely creating a new set of problems.

Pricing and functionality for Ubiquiti and Netgate hardware varies. pfSense has been around a long time and is open source leaving it open to inspection but also vulnerable to certain attacks. Once you start looking at network traffic/capacity the cost goes up. pfSense does not have a universal app where monitoring the Ubiquiti can be coincidental.

moving on

UPDATE I have two ISP connections.  Both pfSense and Edgerouter support dual WAN. I have one ISP connected to each device. I have not made a decision yet.

UPDATE the ERX is incredibly buggy !!!


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…