Skip to main content

Bluetooth competition

I do not particularly like Bluetooth but it is the current standard for personal area networking (PAN). It's a problem, not to be confused with the PC' "challenge", that here in my office I have no less than 10 active mini computers and laptops (and another 2 cars) and while each device will allow me to pair my headphones the outcome is not always the same.

I have a Jabra Evolve 75 that I like to use for conference calls because it's noise cancelling(both side of the conversation) is top notch. Also the Jabra is supposed to be able to actively switch between 2 different active connections. For some strange reason the connection for the Jabra drops here and there. It's terribly annoying.

Last week I purchased the TicPods. They are pretty good but the BASS I like is tough to get even though I can with my wired buds. The freq range is in the pod not the source. Since this bud is a one source bud I have not had the same problems as the Jabra. One other thing... I've turned off the BT on all the other devices in the room so even though the TicPods are paired with multiple devices turning the BT off has eliminated the competition.

Now that I've learned a thing or two I tried again.  I did a RESET on the jabra and then pair it to my desktop. It's been a few minutes and it's working great. The Jabra is over the ear and delivers the frequency range I like although it's a little less intimate and it's not the sort of thing I would wear on an airplane or in public. After I'm satisfied that the Jabra connection is solid I'll add a second device and see what happens.

One thing I have learned lately is that there is a wide variety of "current" bluetooth releases. Most BT headsets on Amazon seem to be BT 4.0, however, there is an ever increasing number of 6.0 showing up in the market. The thing of it is that I should not have to turn off the BT when the paired devices are in the one room. You should be able to actively hijack the connection when you want. As to the proper way to do that could be device specific.

UPDATE according to L2Inc Apple's AirPods cost $10 per pair to make and they sell for $150. These TicPods cost $125 but there are several Anker models that sell for $25.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…