Skip to main content

Bivy Choices

Bivy and tarp are still my preferred shelter and while I have several I still keep track of what's going on. Also in some cases they just do not fit. SAD. In my browser tab order here are the models I'm tracking. Keep in mind I'm biased away from just in time manufacturing or long lead times. Keep in mind these are high-tech 3-season variations of what the military intended.

Two things that bother me about the different models is that the manufacturers are not consistent with the measurements. Sometimes it's width and others it's girth. Sometimes in the same brand. And then they get all wrapped up with height and so on. There are also two general designs. The "tent" where the roof is raised up off the body with shock cord and then there is the sock or bag with or without a headnet or cordage to keep the net off your head.

MLD Bug Bivy $125, 6.5oz, 27in at the chest, NO size options, NO custom (MLD offers a "bivy 2" which has the same size but more silnylon)
MLD bag liner $65, 2.8oz, 57in,  NO size options, NO custom, NO head net
Paria Mesh Bivy $59, 13oz, 33in at the head (not the chest), NO size options, NO custom
Borah Bug Bivy $72-80, 6.0-6.5oz,  width/girth varies, customization is welcome

Borah Ultralight $90-100, 5.6-6.5oz, width/girth varies, customization is welcome

Bear Paw Wilderness Designs $115, 9.0oz, (price and weight vary depending on the materials),  designs and width/girth varies, customization is welcome

Even though I have included 2 socks (Borah, MLD) honorable mention goes to Dutchware and Outdoor Vitals as they offer very lightweight and inexpensive hammock socks that would work as a ground bug bivy and given their size and tunnel you can raise the ends with a ridgeline. To be clear using these socks means that you'll need a groundsheet where most bivy's do not depending on the materials used. Keep in mind that the bottom layer materials can and will wear out.

UPDATE: adding another

Outdoor Research Bug Bivy $89, 16oz, One size,

Outdoor Research Molecular Bivy Sack $83, 16oz, One Size

Outdoor Research Helium Bivy $99, 24oz, One Size


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…