Skip to main content

Shedding some extra gear

I was/am getting ready to shed some extra gear. In the past few months I have been practicing with different sized tarps. I have a number of 10x10 tarps and a newly purchased 8.5x8.5.  The smaller tarp was purchased in response to Evan Shaeffer's AT gear list. As a ground sleeper 8.5x8.5 is OK and it provides options for both with and without bugnets as well as general shelters. But if you've never used a 10x10 they are huge.

This is a 10' tarp and the hammock is also 10'. That means that the configuration needs to be perfect in order to star dry. Even a standard A-frame with a 10x10 flat tarp is a challenge. Once you're in the hammock the length is considerably less but not by much. Also this cat-cut tarp give you few options.

  • 8x8 is 64sq ft with a symmetrical diagonal of 11+
  • 7x9 is 63sq ft with a asymmetrical diagonal of 11+
The weight difference between an 8x8 and 10x10 depends on the material, however, for regular silnylon it's about 5oz. One constant tarp trap is deciding on the size based on the conditions or the mission. I have other tarps that are 9x6 that are black for quick dry as there is humidity year round in Florida. And if there is rain I'd go with a low pitch which can be a challenge. And then with large tarps you lose plenty of cross ventilation.

it was a quick setup and might not be perfectly level.

It looks the same but it is not. I made a number of changes... First it's only one hammock. Instead I clipped the static side to the tree wrap so that the side was generally static. The corner tieouts were the same 5' length as the other tarp so that brought the sides of the tarp close in. Longer lines would be better and offer the ability to use a trekking pole for ventilation. Importantly because this was a half-turtle stand that meant that I needed to guess on the slack. It's a 9' tarp and a 10' hammock. Another challenge will be dealing with the pack.

Ready for a nap it's 9a and dark under the tarp. By noon it will be hot under the tarp and I will need trekking poles or a fan.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…