Skip to main content

love hate with facts and fiction

 I have a love/hate thing going on with Outdoor Vitals. I believe they are a giving and spiritual based company and I only want them to succeed. However, sometimes I just cannot reconcile facts and fiction. The first is the the claim about being ultralight...

And after surveying different companies like ZPacks, Enlightenment, and a few others there is nothing about OV that is UL. To be clear there is no legal definition of Ultralight but there are norms for base back weight and depending on how long and how far UL means many different things. Basically Ultralight is an aggregate term for more than just what OV supplies.

Second, some months ago I purchase a couple of hammocks. I'm not sure why when one would hve been sufficient. I have a couple of other hammocks from Eno and Yukon-Outfitters that I'm not happy with; so OV seemed like a good choice. And because of how I plan my hiking and camping I like to have choices and backup plans... Therefore one more tarp. I did not own a hammock tarp with catcuts and yet they are all the rage.
The tarp looks great here. The hammock is snugged nicely underneath and so the lengths are good.

I'm not sure which hammock I purchased because the offering has changed since I bought mine.  I'm thinking it's the 10ft model.

The 6 sided tarp should have fit nicely.

But as you can see the end of the hammock is sticking out. Keep in mind that this is not a standard configuration. First I have two hammocks under there. Also, at one end I'm using a hammock stand so there is movement. But even so this is a hammockers worst nightmare...

The tarp is clearly wet. This is from rain, however, it's also very humid as the underside of the tarps are wet too. Interestingly one hammock had a puddle about midway which could only have been a leak as it was better positioned under the tarp but it was also sort of damp from the overall humidity. The second hammock had a streak of water from the end to the center. This was clearly rain.

One thing for sure is that setup and practice is everything. Second it's better when the gear helps or compensates for mother nature. And it's better when sales and marketing teams do not exaggerate.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…