Skip to main content

Batteries or rechargeable cells?

The question is whether to use rechargeable battery banks or just plain batteries. I think I have the answer and it's a keeper.

Two weeks ago I went camping with the kids. It was hot and so I brought my 8 inch fan that runs from 6 D-cell batteries. I had not remembered when I change the batteries last so I brought an additional 10 cells with me. Then I misplaced them, borrowed some, then found them. All the while we were talking about running to Walmart and buying a fan and an extension cord.

Now that I'm home I'm looking at my options for the next camping trip. As I looked at different size fans with different recharge capacities I find myself looking at solar and larger batteries. But the question is what is the best solution for my needs. I need to run a descent fan in the tent to keep the kids cool and it needs to run for about 3-4 nights assuming the kids remember to turn it off.

So here I'm looking at some gear. 75000mAH battery for $299; 100W solar panel $200; fan $29. The 60W version of the solar panel is supposed to charge the battery in 10-12 hours. If wattage means anything is this faster. The fan is also rechargeable and has three power sources including a lighter socket which is essentially charging DC-DC; AC-DC would cost an extra 30% for the conversion. And optionally 8 D-cell batteries.

The fan also makes these claims:
Rechargeable Battery Life - up to 5 hours
Alkaline Battery Life - up to 56 hours on Low Speed and up to 37 hours on High Speed depending on brand of batteries selected

So then I started to do the math on my original FAN.

6 D-cells in series. Each D-cell is approx 13000mAh. In series that's 78000mAh. And costs about $10
Just the battery alone (assuming I plugged it in during the day) had the same capacity.

Anker battery 26500mAh

D-cells in series at 78000mAh
Let's not forget the time it takes to recharge the device and that LI batteries behave badly in hot and cold.


I would have to charge this device 30 times in order to get the price per charge to the same as equivalent D-cells. Assuming that the 7.5 pounds and the time to recharge mean nothing.



Solar panels come in many sizes and I have no idea what they mean except the higher the number the more they charge for them. The number clearly indicates how many devices can be charged in parallel or how fast a battery bank will charge.



The description for this fan makes it clear that Alkaline batteries are the way to go. 37 hours; means approx 4 days times the 30x of the bank means that you'd need 120 consecutive days as the duty cycle to break even. If recharging with the 100W solar panel and good sunlight every day then the additional extends another 12 cycles unless you drop the wattage to something that works with the duty cycle.

So, for as often as I go camping with the kids use batteries. As often as I hike on weekends use batteries. As often as there are hurricanes use batteries for the first month and if it looks like it's going to continue then get a solar panel and power bank. In the meantime I think two of these fans makes sense. And just maybe the solar panel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…