Skip to main content

7x9 tarp half mid

I have a number of different tarps in different sizes. I'm not bragging because it's stupid to have this much gear specially when I hike about 4 times a year. SAD!

Watching Evan Shaeffer hike with his 8.5x8.5 cuban tarp and JupiterHikes with his tarp and listening to their stories... as well as flatbrokehiker and some books I've read ... There is stuff to be learned. [a] be comfortable [b] endure some discomfort [c] just take what you need [d] camp is meant for sleeping.
I think MLD has a tarp they call the "monk". It's a lightweight 4x8 or 4x9 if they even sell it anymore.
I've been testing my 5x9 in the backyard and it's been OK. No major challenges that I can see. It is clearly the "monk" style where it's just meant for sleep and there is not much wrong with that. There's not much room under the tarp for deploying a pole to keep the bugnet of my bivy off my face.

BorahGear 5.5x9
There is just enough coverage under the tarp and to stay dry you gotta stay away from the opening. You might be able to sit up but hunched a bit. Cooking could be risky.

BorahGear 7x9
You might not be able to tell but the 7x9 is two feet deeper meaning the setup could be dryer from the initial deploy. There were a couple of challenges with this setup. The ridge from the pole to the back tieout had more tension because it was heavier. The trekking pole did not have the basket so getting it to stay put was a challenge and will likely need a better knot. Being almost square the angle were different. What's nice is that I can sit up, even cook under cover (alcohol, tab or gas).

As much as a criticize tarps that a asym or catcut and biased for AFrame conflagrations this seems like the ideal configuration for a flat tarp. Certainly I can create more room or ventilation with a second trekking pole. I can also pitch it closer to the ground. This particular tarp only has tieout points around the perimeter and so that limits the usefulness.


The tarp could not be tensioned in all directions but this seemed like it was still OK. I had not hammered the stakes deep into the ground as I should and with this configuration they'd just pop out so it's reasonable.


I initially thought that the back wall should be square. Once I put tension on the pole through to the back-center I realized that a slight bow was preferred.

Lastly, when folded like a sheet the 7x9 packs small. I'm not sure this is reasonable in the rain but it's possible... but if you are using a small pack like a UD-15 then you better practice. Things I like about this configuration:

  • I only need 3 cords and no special knots.
  • a trekking pole is best but a tent pole works. Even better a bush or a tree can act as a 4th wall.
  • using a poncho tarp eliminates some gear
  • easier to get in/out of than an a-frame
Moving on...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…