Skip to main content

dynamic sizing and reporting services

Most developers and system designers underestimate the complexity of reporting systems. Sure the first few reports are easy and sometimes downright trivial but that does not last long as you become the product of your success.

First of all there is challenge with concurrent reporting... just how many reports can you run at once? That's partly a network bandwidth thing and a memory thing and a computational thing. But it depends where the reports are being executed, local or remote, and whether the DB is sized properly too.

Then there is the catalog of reports and the largest with the most computational stress and the variable idle time between reports. And then there is the reporting schedule and the manual demands; all of which have queuing theory challenges.

Of course then there's report delivery and it's challenges, archiving, replication, consistency between reports, formatting, and security. And it gets worse.

My current challenges right now is that my static reporting server has about 8GB ram which is fine for day to day reports. Running at AWS it costs about $61 a month. A very similar machine at DigitalOcean costs $40.

However the monthend financials report requires 32GB ran and at AWS it costs $320 and $160 at DigitalOcean. The thing is 32GB would be sitting idle most of the month. It would be great to increase the concurrency so the scheduler could spawn execution engines instead of trying to be monolithic. And there is the DB server... it too can limit all of the above.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…