Skip to main content

The hammock critics are in

Here are some hammocks and why I do not like them...



The ENO hammock, straps, and tarp might be bullet proof, however, they are heavy. Probably the heaviest in the bunch. I cut my hammock teeth on this hammock and I should have saved my money. I tried to replace the straps with 770 cordage and other straps but both failed. The tarp does not really fit in the bag.

The one Yukon Outfitters(YO) hammock is lighter than the next but their straps are heavy. I replaced one set of straps with some Dutchware gear which made the lighter hammock a better contender but not by much. The bugnet is heavier than the alternative from Dutchware too. It also barely fits in it's sack. Lastly the diamond shaped tarp is useless for anything else and while not heavy it's not the lightest. YO no longer sells these modes. My guess the materials are too light.

I have 2 complete Outdoor Vitals(OV) hammocks and tarps. The last thing I just noticed as I tried to re-stuff the ENO back in it's sack is the similarity to the OV tarp. The corners, the hardware, the way the hardware was attached, the design of the stuff sack. The hammocks are 4' wide which makes it harder to sleep diagonally. These were purchase before they sold their double, however, it's a strange size when compared to the STS who single is 5" wide. UPDATE I forgot to mention that OV uses whoopie slings instead of straps and the demo video cautions against getting them dirty.

Not pictured above is the Klymit Traverse and tarp. These are just stupid heavy and I want to return them before I try them out. I've determined that a modest hammock setup is going to weigh about 2 pounds; this combo weighs double that and nearly double the pack volume.

The dutchware bugnet is awesome. The OV bugnet might be a close second because of it's price but it seems heavier from the materials. The Sea to Summit tarp is tucked away. It has an odd shape making it difficult to use it for other purposes; but not impossible. The stuff sack can be a challenge if you are in a rush. The straps are not universal.

In conclusion I'm confident that a 2 pound hammock shelter is possible and no more costly. Deploying a hammock shelter means that you need trees, some camps do not permit hammocks, and in some cases the ground under the hammock can be dangerous. Of course there is a ground configuration but that takes practice and defeats the purpose.

  • STS pro with hammock tarp and bugnet will cost about $250 at just about 23oz.
  • SixMoonDesigns Luna weighs 26oz and costs $200; all you need is a trekking pole.
  • Borah Bivy and tarp weighs under a pound and costs about $150 but it needs to fit correctly or you'll get bit anyway; manufactured on demand.
  • Paris bivy and tarp costs $140 and weight 24oz; with the advantage of overnight shipping.


--

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SINGLE AND DOUBLE -- One might think that a double is suited for two people. Well, it is, sort of. It just means that there is slightly more width t the product but that does not add any strength. The manufacturers above make no separate claims. The extra width is supposed to offer room for a second person but frankly there are still unreasonable weight limits (400 pounds is not much) and because the hammock is not tapered the side have a tendency to wrap the person like a cocoon. And only more so in the double.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…