Skip to main content

hate to call it a gear review

Mattresses and pillows oh my...

I recently purchased a pack liner and so I wanted to open up my pack and clean things up a bit before my next hike; and it's also s much a mental exercise than anything else. I was also surprised because I found extra pillows in here.

From left to right...

  • giant ziplock easily replaced with a waterproof compression sack or pack liner. Ziplocks are cheap and replaced at any grocery. Pack liners too.
  • Borah net bivy with ridge zipper; it will be placed in the liner/bag without a stuff sack
  • 6x9 black tarp in a blue stuff sack. I will certainly leave the sack behind because I need quick deploy and I do not mind if the pack is wet.
  • Sleeping bag liner. This one is for winter and frankly never worked. I was just meant to add a little comfort (more below)
  • polycryo groundsheet. Not really necessary because I consider the bivy generally disposable, however, condensation from the ground means it can collect sand or other bits and if the bivy is to be packed in the liner it should be dry.
  • small black synthetic pilow and medium brown inflatable from Snugpak. This was a surprise because I remember making the purchase just not putting it in my pack. The combination gave me some comfort and choices.
  • The mattress is a regular length Klymit ultra light. It's loft is not as high as the other but it's longer and just as comfortable. Different fill valve too. 

So I'm not a fan of the sleeping bag liner and I like the blanket ... the weight is close to the same but the volume is a bit different but it should work. The blanket is also better if it gets wet. Where the liner is a fail when when.

I plan to carry an umbrella in order to block the rain from the head end of the tarp, however, ponchos and rain jackets have many functions. The yellow poncho is light and can double as a tarp. The black poncho has sleeves and because it's black it can keep you warmer and it should dry faster. For the time-being I think warmer and dry faster are better.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…