Skip to main content

different tarps

I cannot wait until my next overnight hiking trip into the Big Cypress Preserve. The weather, lately, has been very wet, hot and steamy; so making the right tarp selection is important. The grey tarp did a fine job, kept me dry from the condensation but in the pouring rain I'm way too exposed because the poles are too tall and not adjustable. I think they were 48".

The green, Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp, has a nice size and is meant to be close to the ground.

The black tarp is an option because unlike the grey tarp it might dry faster. Unlike the Twinn Tarp this one (bearpaw wilderness designs) does not have a seam in the ridge line I'm not concerned about the seams being sealed.

The Twinn Tarp has a nice lineloc, line, grommet etc...

I did some DIY from a poop bag roll and I have a grommet from Yama Mountain Gear (shown but not in use).

Lastly the conditions changed and the visible shade was obvious (unlike the previous pictures). The black tarp provided plenty of shade.

In conclusion the choice seems clear to me. Where the Twinn seems to be meant for 2 people, has a seam down the center,  pitched in the one configuration, and with limited choices on the ridgeline... the flat tarp from bearpaw wilderness is just fine for one person and since it's flat is capable of my configurations. The black means it'll dry faster and looks like it's also got more shade.

PS: both have bivy or let tent loops just inside the tarp on the ridgeline.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…