Skip to main content

OSX Photo is taking too long to sync

I've complained about my wife's OSX machine in the recent past. This issue is that when I enable iCloud sync my home network slows to a crawl. The only evidence that I have for the network failure is congestion at the router. At the time my network was rated at 5MB/50MB (up/dn).

And with a little luck my ISP upgraded me to 10MB/100MB today. Since my photos never completed the sync I restarted the process today. As it turns out I watched a national news article about computer ransom-ware last night and I needed to get the backup started again.

The increase in bandwidth did not really fix things but it did redirect my focus.

  • I might have failed to notice that Photo, backblaze and G+ were all running at the same time. That's not a solid practice.
  • Photo's sync seems to use a shared OSX proxy so that it can monitor or shape the network usage, however, the end result seems to have been complete network saturation.
  • Uploading files at WiFi speeds or even 100MG should not be taking to the CPU. And at the same time the fan was going crazy the "monitor" indicated that there was no network usage. When I switched over to CPU is seems that a codec was using all available CPU.
Well my network issue has not been resolved except that the interruptions per upload are fewer. The problem, however, is that while my wife has been taking new pictures we are not safe.

UPDATE 2016-04-25:  When I connected my MacBook to a wired network my sync seemed to make progress and only mildly disturbed the other systems in my network. I'm not crazy with the notion that a single wireless device could crash the entire LAN.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…