Skip to main content

Android vs ChromeOS

In the past few months there has been some press relating to the merging of Android and ChromeOS. There have been talking heads from all corners with varying opinions that likely have less to do with Google's failure and more to do with moving eyeballs to non-Google devices.

If Google elects to do anything in this space I strongly recommend starting with the requirements. For example; there is more compute horsepower in most smartphones than there is any of the Chromebooks. So why does Chromebook install a release in 9 seconds and a new Android release can take 20 minutes?

This past week Motorols replaced my damaged Nexus 6 with a refurbished device. First of all the model was exactly alike with the same AT&T crapware. Even though I had been in developer-mode on my damaged phone the closest backup was 41 days away. Android installed most of the Apps I had installed on the previous phone and most of the data that was managed in the cloud (mostly Google software) My only complaint was that I needed to install no less than 7 system updates taking 15 minutes each.

Keep in mind that the restore process was better than Apple.

I cannot say for certain but I think Google produces a baseline Android OS that the manufacturers tweak for the individual vendors; thus the horrible AT&T splash screen. It also means that releases cannot be merged without great effort and so I needed to reboot multiple times. On the other hand Chromebook manufacturers seem to adopt the OS first mentality meaning that the hardware follows.

Can this be confirmed or is it just my intuition?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

Agile is still dead and has been since 1991

[updated 2011.09.30] yet another response to Agile is good.
When you have so much of you career invested in something like Agile, XP etc... it can be hard to see the forest for the trees. I had a consulting job in The Haag many years ago. IBM was the incumbent contractor at the customer site (a bank) but after 5 years on the job they had not written a single line of functioning code. In the office there were two teams of software people... both behind closed doors. The first team was the Data team and the second team was Functional. They rarely spoke and they never shared information. I was there for a week, introduced the client to OO and we had a functioning prototype. Smart people do smart things, You cannot make an underachiever exceptional by using Agile. Either they get "it" or they don't.
I just commented on a blog. I'm sure there is some validity to his post beyond observing that Agile Scrum is broken. It certainly is not what it was originally intended but for…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…