Skip to main content

Google OnHub Review

WiFi was never as complicated as it is today and the ignorance of the hardwired lifestyle is to be appreciated. Personally I have owned a number of different firewall-routers going back to an Intel 56KB modem router; through many d-Link, TP-Link, Linksys, Apple. Now I'm the owner of a Google firewall router that is manufactured by TP-Link.

I'm not certain who did what part of the package, however, I recently read an article where Google is no happy with it's Nexus vendor(s) which is why they brought the Pixel-C under Google manufacturing. Who knows?

I watched a demo of the OnHub and I was immediately impressed. Not because the packaging looked like it was from Tiffany's but because it was said to have 16 antennas and one high performance directional. (My house is concrete and steel with metal studs. It's practically a Faraday cage. Second the software was described as advanced and feature-full... or some such.

While all that seems kitsch there are still plenty of warts:

  • The packaging is nice compared to current standards. I suppose it's meant for housewives(color recognition) or the less technical as techies might not care much about it. I don't.
  • The box indicates that there are setup instructions. There were none, however, once the app is installed all was revealed.
  • Since I was replacing an existing installation I decided to use my existing cables. Normal flex/tension gaskets around the typical Ethernet cable make it difficult or impossible to install the cover.
  • The documentation indicates that one should put the OnHub in a prominent place. On the one hand that makes sense so you can see the status color ring. On the otherhand it's stupid because most of the problems that the OnHub is supposed to solve are related to placement, power, and performance. Placement requires, access to power, the wired internal network, the external modem. None of these things are going to be in the "prominent" place in the home.
  • When the placement of OnHub is above eye-level it's impossible to see the status ring.
That was just the physical stuff. Now comes the software.
  • The setup was pretty painless
  • missing some features
  • couple of miscues but nothing terrible
  • some of the more complicated or edge case features have weaker interfaces
Customer Support:
  • on the phone within 2 minutes
  • answered all of my questions
  • she was just a little distracted in her environment
Questions:
  1. guest networks are in the project plan
  2. directional antenna is opposite of the wiring
  3. actually 13 antennas
  4. cover is not required for airflow
I also offered a feature request: What about a Chromecast puck-like device that would provide a remote OnHub status. I suppose this could also be a WiFi bridge but my place is not that big.

UPDATE: One thing that is missing... MAC white and black lists so that you do not have to change your password in order to recover your network. Actually having dual passwords for the primary network would be very useful so I could rotate passwords without disrupting all of the users.

UPDATE:  I'd like to be able to name a device that did not provide a proper DHCP hostname. And guess what... no static IP addresses or set DHCP addresses.

UPDATE: my Tivo did not work. It uses the wired network but would not change it's DHCP address. I remember that there was a menu option but could not find it.  There was also an option to RESTART the Tivo but that too was absent (it's in HD mode now with a different menu tree). So I just unplugged the Tivo an all was good when it restarted.

UPDATE: This morning when I woke up the internet was down. I know that because the OnHub android app told me so, however, the status ring on the device was teal indicating that things were ok. This is essentially the same problem I was having with my Apple extreme router. I'm not sure when things went south but they did. My internet was fine when I went to sleep the night before and most of our devices were sleeping except one.  The family MacBook running a sync process for the new iCloud Photo Library. I rebooted the hub and put the mac to sleep... the OnHub app indicated that the macbook was consuming about 1.1GB per hour. The conclusion is that there is something that iPhoto is doing that is corrupting the network at a very basic level. There is a post on the apple discussion boards.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

Agile is still dead and has been since 1991

[updated 2011.09.30] yet another response to Agile is good.
When you have so much of you career invested in something like Agile, XP etc... it can be hard to see the forest for the trees. I had a consulting job in The Haag many years ago. IBM was the incumbent contractor at the customer site (a bank) but after 5 years on the job they had not written a single line of functioning code. In the office there were two teams of software people... both behind closed doors. The first team was the Data team and the second team was Functional. They rarely spoke and they never shared information. I was there for a week, introduced the client to OO and we had a functioning prototype. Smart people do smart things, You cannot make an underachiever exceptional by using Agile. Either they get "it" or they don't.
I just commented on a blog. I'm sure there is some validity to his post beyond observing that Agile Scrum is broken. It certainly is not what it was originally intended but for…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…