Skip to main content

Docker Machine Providers - Review

I've been deploying CoreOS and Docker in this configuration:

And while I have had some success I have posted a number of questions and concerns with the Digital Ocean support team and most responses start with "We're sorry" and end with "ask the CoreOS team". I think that there is at least one serious flaw with DO's product and that is that every VM instance received a public IP address and there is no firewall. The side effect being that every system in my cluster has been under attack since it was deployed.

  • no network drives
  • no firewall
  • limited support
So I'll be leaving them shortly. But what is interesting is that Digital Ocean supports Docker Machine. Docker Machine is Docker's way of creating Docker instances. Presumably there is some sort of shim between the host OS and the Docker container... While it might work it's an odd feature.

Of course if you have an OpenStack, VMware, or Vagrant then it makes perfect sense.  The shim will give you the proper cost performance that you need but if MS Azure, RackSpace or GCE is charging micro instance prices for container instances then it seems a little askew.

While I was looking at the Docker Machine Driver page I could not come to any other conclusion... and so I swing back to hosting my own CoreOS or RancherOS instances; I happen to prefer CoreOS as Rancher has not exposed their pricing model and I'm going too far down that rabbit hole.

One thing I like about DO is that it costs $5 for their micro instance; although Google's compute engine is just slightly cheaper.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…