Skip to main content

"88% agree that collaborative work environments have better morale"

Someone touched off a nerve in me this morning because this quote is total bullshit. Google For Work attributed the quote to Reconteur.
I did a search on the Reconteur site and found that the quote in question comes from the "special reports" section of the site. I'm not sure what this means but the article was behind closed doors and yet good was quoting it. Seems that this might have been an advert without stating it was an advert.

Without being able to read the original source material and accompanying research I cannot directly challenge the statement except that since this was an advert it is not likely real. Not to mention that the claim itself has many holes.

  • what is a collaborative work environment
  • what is the opposite environment
  • is software required for a collaborative work environment
  • which software, does it have to be Google for Work specifically
It doesn't take an ivy league researcher to figure this out. The root cause of higher morale in the work place has multiple components from the product, the people, managers, principles and the customers. It's also BS to say 88%... of what? of the bottom line or some other fraction therein.

A quick google search yielded plenty of results. I picked one. Collaboration was not mentioned once. In my next search this article and research concluded that allowing pets in the workplace would improve collaboration.

Finally, I think the writers at Forbes might have a better take on morale in this article. "12 habits of highly collaborative organizations" and they do not mention software or google once.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

Agile is still dead and has been since 1991

[updated 2011.09.30] yet another response to Agile is good.
When you have so much of you career invested in something like Agile, XP etc... it can be hard to see the forest for the trees. I had a consulting job in The Haag many years ago. IBM was the incumbent contractor at the customer site (a bank) but after 5 years on the job they had not written a single line of functioning code. In the office there were two teams of software people... both behind closed doors. The first team was the Data team and the second team was Functional. They rarely spoke and they never shared information. I was there for a week, introduced the client to OO and we had a functioning prototype. Smart people do smart things, You cannot make an underachiever exceptional by using Agile. Either they get "it" or they don't.
I just commented on a blog. I'm sure there is some validity to his post beyond observing that Agile Scrum is broken. It certainly is not what it was originally intended but for…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…