Skip to main content

de-google yourself?

I'm concerned about my privacy and personal information security; this morning my father pointed me to this article that espoused all the evil things that Google does with my data, cookies, email, and personal information.

I does not take too much effort to debunk everything the author lays claim too in fact it is also demonstrated by (a) the publisher of the article (b) the commenting system therein (c) and it's advertisers; as they are all part of the profit machine trying to monetize it's visitors. (no different than Google just on a different scale)
the publisher's site was closed for comment, however, that information was not available to me prior to registering. Had commenting been closed I would never have registered.
The author of the article made certain recommendations and claims;

Step 1: Spread your data.

This might do more harm than good.  Spreading your data means that the premium associated with your data is higher. (the sum of the parts is less expensive than the parts sold separately; economics 101)  It also puts the cost of managing all this data, the individual policy and procedures, and maintenance.

Step 2: Search Differently

There are a number of other search engines. Duck Duck Go comes to mind. While Google is not necessarily a search company they are the best search company.

Step 3: Crumble the Cookies

Cookie security makes sense, however, while there are a certain number of cookies that belong to the application and some to the advertiser/ghost hunters it's impossible to determine the difference so that the browser can be selective. Burning your cookies can and will eventually degrade your experience.

Step 4: gmail

If you do not want some of the advertising associated with gmail then simply pay for it ($50/yr). You already pay for MS Outlook and OSX Mail when you purchase their operating systems.

Step 5: Cloud Storage

I'm not sure what the author was getting to here. This irrational fear of vendors having access to your data has been around for quite a while.  It started with the terms of service at both Box and DropBox. Both companies asked the users to give them permission to access and modify the documents. While the terms were evil sounding and vague; in the end it was just about asking permission to compress, archive and relocate your data on their servers. It was clearly an over imaginative attorney who was splitting fiber but it was out there.

By comparison, Google Drive and Google App, have a number of compliance certificates including HIPPA and PCI. This means that while Google has your documents it is not reading them; by which I mean operating on them, taking action, or changing anything about your experience. (but they are reading them in a binary sense as is the case with all the other browsers and file managers.

Step 6: SmartPhone

It's hard to know, for certain, what information we might be leaking and just how private it might be. Given the cost of our smartphones you'd think that the information we are leaking would give us a better discount. For example the traffic indicator on the maps application is harvested by all of the other phones on the road with you at the same time. The information is supposed to be anonymous and it likely is, however, a motivated someone might be able to crack the code. Between the GPS, WiFI navigation etc... someone with access to a traffic camera and map telemetry could probably isolate a single individual.

If the price is too high, turn it off.

Conclusion:

You do not get anything for free these days. Everyone wants something whether it's you email address, phone number or location. Even the article's publisher and the author have an interest in knowing who you are. (this article is posted on Blogger and previously WordPress. Both try to monetize it's readers)

Until someone can prove that Google is doing something evil with my data I trust them before all the other bobs out there.

UPDATE:  The author of the article @DerekInBerlin was published by The Irish Times. The website is full of advertising and analytics; including Google's own. Since the Derek did not provide an email address; only a twitter; he's also selling his information in a manner of speaking.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

Agile is still dead and has been since 1991

[updated 2011.09.30] yet another response to Agile is good.
When you have so much of you career invested in something like Agile, XP etc... it can be hard to see the forest for the trees. I had a consulting job in The Haag many years ago. IBM was the incumbent contractor at the customer site (a bank) but after 5 years on the job they had not written a single line of functioning code. In the office there were two teams of software people... both behind closed doors. The first team was the Data team and the second team was Functional. They rarely spoke and they never shared information. I was there for a week, introduced the client to OO and we had a functioning prototype. Smart people do smart things, You cannot make an underachiever exceptional by using Agile. Either they get "it" or they don't.
I just commented on a blog. I'm sure there is some validity to his post beyond observing that Agile Scrum is broken. It certainly is not what it was originally intended but for…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…