Skip to main content

pay per view is up

I recognize that most people see pay per view as a brand name, however, I'm referring to the not so free versions of Netflix, HBO Go, Amazon Prime, Rokku and so on. In each of these examples you have to pay to view and you definitely pay per view.

So the question, for me, is what is the cause of this sudden decline? Is it:

  1. letters from Comcast and other ISPs who operate on the bounty program with the property owners? They certainly do not do it out of altruism.
  2. What about individual DMCA letters? I think the press has squashed that one by embarassing the property owners.
  3. How about the deep discounts of products like Netflix, Amazon, Comcast on demand, etc... for $8/mo it's all you can eat.
  4. And maybe the numbers are off a bit. The advent of TOR, darknet, and private sharing clubs these numbers are off the grid.
It's probably a combination of things and not limited to the above. The Pirate Bay has been in and out of trouble over the last few years. Wrapping themselves in the cloak of free speech and similar legal prophylactics which not be sustained over time as the founders and operators have been incarcerated and help liable. Frankly speaking there was a time when The Pirate Bay was easy to navigate and easy to view and review content. They only had 2 advertisers; one of which, MacKeeper, is now considered by most to be malware and the other is a porn site.

But as this grey-ish area of the net teeters on the fence of free and not so free malware, sticky websites, poor quality, viruses, and the fear of getting caught... the alternatives are just too plentiful.

My only complaint is that after you combine the costs of:
Comcast $100-200/mo
Netflix $7/mo
Amazon $10/mo
iTunes mkt value
you still cannot (a) get everything you want to watch (b) nothing includes all the network TV (c) even if you added everything there are still independent holdouts. 

The strange thing is that some ISP and cable providers could provide a one price buffet of lobster and fillet but they don't. Comcast is close but their prices are higher than the aggregate, the software SUCKS, and they also inject advertising in place of the original adverts. It's good for them but crappy for me. If we are already paying for it then it should be sans commercials and if it has commercials it should be free. Everyone is getting just a little too greedy.

PS: Comcast is under scrutiny for being a monopoly. Their defense is that they do not complete with themselves in the various markets they are in. Sadly in most cases there is only one cable provider in any community and when there is an opportunity to compete only one division is given access. OTA and satellite are not an option. It's an embarrassment to our country that deep pockets wins the day.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

Agile is still dead and has been since 1991

[updated 2011.09.30] yet another response to Agile is good.
When you have so much of you career invested in something like Agile, XP etc... it can be hard to see the forest for the trees. I had a consulting job in The Haag many years ago. IBM was the incumbent contractor at the customer site (a bank) but after 5 years on the job they had not written a single line of functioning code. In the office there were two teams of software people... both behind closed doors. The first team was the Data team and the second team was Functional. They rarely spoke and they never shared information. I was there for a week, introduced the client to OO and we had a functioning prototype. Smart people do smart things, You cannot make an underachiever exceptional by using Agile. Either they get "it" or they don't.
I just commented on a blog. I'm sure there is some validity to his post beyond observing that Agile Scrum is broken. It certainly is not what it was originally intended but for…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…