Skip to main content

Chromebook Pixel Type-C USB

I really like my Chromebook Pixel with 16GB RAM, 64GB SSD, i7, and 128GB SD card. However I have a few complaints.
On the left side of the based of the laptop is the Type-C USB port.  It's used for peripherals as well as the power cord.  One of the things that makes the Type-C desirable is that the plugs are not directional. There is no right-side up any more.

What you should also notice is that the width of the base is slim and the receiver is midway; meaning that in order to remove the connector you actually have to tip the laptop in order to wrap your fingers around the plug to remove it. And since there is a similar connector on the other side of the keyboard tilting the laptop could put unreasonable stress on the other connector. Furthermore there is no obvious way to lift the laptop in a smooth motion except to grab it by the screen bezel and since it's a touch screen that might not be a good thing either. One could always argue that closing the lid and then pulling the connector is the best way but then there are some sleep or docking state things to consider.

I wonder of the (a) the connector should have been similar to the MacBook's magsafe (b) some sort of slim contactless charger (c) put the connector on the screen side of the case close to the hing. At least then a one-handed person might have a better chance to manipulate the connector. Only [c] offers keeping the Type-C form factor in place.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…