Skip to main content

Nim namespacing

Reading this comment in a post:
Namespacing is very sloppy. Importing a module dumps the entirety of its contents into your namespace. Method calls are just syntactic sugar: a.b() is exactly the same as b(a), so methods are also in the globalish namespace. Seems to rely extremely heavily on overloading.
I applaud his commitment, the post was very long and addressed a number of topics. One thing that caught my eye was your criticism of nim namespacing or lack thereof. I'm not sure I have a strong enough opinion either way but one thing I have been noodling on is the notion of a monolithic codebase with a global namespace. Silly me, this is exactly how C does it so it's only natural that Nim does too. Java and C# privacy modifiers are nonsensical since "we" typically have access to the source. The Go implementation uses case for privacy but implements package namespaces which are easy to overlap meaning having to use aliases.

In a related post. Namespaces are supposed to provide some sort of orthogonal barrier between packages. One perfect example is the C compiler.  Most C compilers prefix all user attributes, variables and functions with a '_' (underscore).  This way there is no possible way for the user code to overlap with the compiler-provided code and libraries.

If the compiler defined a variable SYS and the user defined a similar variable; the user variable would be renamed to _SYS so the two would not reference the same data or cause linker issues. 'C' does not address the issue between libraries. If you have two libraries that perform different functions but have the same name then you have a serious challenge ahead of you.

While I'm not invested in the subject one way or the other I can see the merit and making namespaces optional might create it's own challenges. I think the answer is going to be some sort of meta approach that will satisfy both sides. Golang's generate subcommand seems to have some potential in this area although current examples have been fairly trivial string replaces or Stringer code generators.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…