Skip to main content

Aggregated logging - the Google lesson

Whenever I build or deploy distributed systems the topic of log aggregation always pops up. I wish it were a difficult topic because then there would be some money to be made with a solution and with the number of times I've built these systems... I'd be very wealthy.

A friend of mine pointed me to a service/application that I was already familiar with. Bosun is a monitoring application from the makes of stack exchange. If my memory serves me this system is the first Go application written by Fog Creek/Stack Exchange. I do not remember my exact first impressions but looking at the code today I see a number of questionable practices. However,  in the end it comes down to answering a few brief questions which will all direct you you to the same place.

- are you going to aggregate 100% of the messages from the system being monitored
- how big is that 100%
- if you have 100 or 20,000 systems being monitored will the log aggregator be able to hold all of that data
- what is the data retention policy and do you have enough storage
- how long is it going to take to aggregate the data
- when its time to start deleting data will the system be available (usually not)
- what sort of queries will need to be performed on the data
- will you map-reduce
- what happens when the primary aggregator fails
- replicate the primary DB to a hot backup
- how many users will query the data in real time
- what sort of monitoring and alerting dashboard is there
- clock drift, latency, queuing cause event ordering issues.

And so on...

Basically, if you think you're going to aggregate the logs from 20K servers to some sort of logging/aggregation server like logstash, loggly, new-relic then you might not actually know your data or your systems.

Google has considerably more servers and yet they do not do log aggregation. Google performs event aggregation. When something happens that requires intervention then the system being monitored sends an alert to the monitor which then alerts the appropriate staff. This is an actionable event. If the event requires more information, as in the real logs, then the operator or SRE must log into or request the logs from the alerting system.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…