Skip to main content

Total Cost of Ownership - Apple, MicroSoft, Google

I constantly struggle with the cost of my hardware and software choices. I also struggle with the cost of quality, reliability and support of the hardware. And finally I struggle with the quality, features, and cost of the software.


In reality, when comparing the cost of Apple hardware to equivalent hardware from Dell, HP, Sony, or Lenovo - the cost is very close. Dell and HP might be a little less expensive, however, Sony and Lenovo can actually cost more. Please keep in mind I'm also comparing hardware component quality, features, reliability, support; so you will not see me compare Acer or Packard Bell.


Since MicroSoft does not have anything except it's software in it's catalog it has to sell it's operating system as the product. In order to receive premium dollars it has to create a catalog of versions with varying levels of features and support. The last time I purchased an OEM Windows disk it cost me about $125 for the home edition and $250 for the pro. Furthermore Microsoft does a full upgrade every 18 - 24 months. And if you consider the amount of bundle-ware that the manufacturers provide (which is a revenue center for them); the number of BSOD (blue screen of death); reformats; viruses...

Once you have purchased an Apple device it's operating system upgrade are free until the machine reaches end of life. Many years ago Apple charged $25 for an upgrade but it's free now. The extra ordinary news is that I have two laptops that are about 5 years old and only one is EOL and cannot be upgraded.


If you consider any premium dollars you might have spent to purchase an Apple computer and the ongoing cost of maintenance then the cost of an Apple computer is close to it's peers if not better than most. It's also trivial to put a price on user experience which Apple wins hand's down.

I like Google but I cannot compare them to Apple or MS.  The hardware is the lowest commodity hardware a person could purchase. In many cases the fit and finish is a little substandard reducing productivity below any meaningful level. It also requires that the user be online in order to take full advantage of the connectivity. I like my ChromeBox and ChromeBook but I cannot replace my MacBook Air with a ChromeBook. It's just not up to the intended use-case.

As a footnote; The integration and style of the other apple products like the iPhone, iPad, watch, Apple TV are so spot on as to appear to be a seamless joint. The counterparts from MicroSoft and Google are still rough around the edges. And while someone once said "once in a while you have to purchase the underdog product to keep the competition going" I'm not certain we're there yet.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…