Skip to main content

Citadel - Docker APIs

I have been researching Docker; orchestration, composition, or scheduling; depending on which sources you've been following. And as I wander around this maze I have looked at many different approaches to the problem. Everything from Puppet, Chef, Ansible, SaltStack, to Panamax, Kubernetes, Fleet, Mesophere, Deis, Flynn, Fig, shipyard; ambassadord, registrator ... and more. I even departed from these suggestions to look at Citadel which is an API tooklit for interacting with Docker directly.

The Citadel Toolkit give you the necessary tools and frameworks to implement your "configuration as code". It is the foundation which Shipyard is implemented; while Shipyard uses Citadel as part of the GUI there is no reason why the "application" could not be a static configuration in a "solo" fashion. Citadel is robust enough that you could deploy ambassadors or sidekicks while deploying the target container. Citadel shines in that it provides an API metaphor for deploying containers in clusters as well as allowing user defined "scheduling" functions.

Where Citadel fails is that it implements some of the features that Fleet does but is incomplete. Citadel, by itself, cannot cron, auto-restart with restarting forever, and the schedulers still need to be implemented.

If you need basic access for deploying containers or maybe taking an image of the running containers then this is a nice tool. But launching or deploying is another matter. Fleet is still the hands down winner even though it's "configuration as configuration".

[UPDATE] I think that fleet might be a better input mechanism and citadel might be a better output, however, it may not be completely clear where they crossover.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…