Skip to main content

Danger Google Search - Serious OpenSource Weakness

Warning - a bit of a scatterbrain today

I needed to install a fresh Windows install in a VMware virtual machine along with a number of developer tools like Visual Studio. I also needed to install the latest version of Firefox and Chrome. Sadly there is a very serious threat to privacy trending out there and so long as the barrier is lower to modify the source and the cost to advertise is lower than the value... this will continue.

Google, Yahoo and Bing searches for Chrome, Firefox (UPDATE: Opera) browsers all returned Ad or otherwise sponsored links to 3rd parties who are repackaging these applications in their own installer with, in some cases, malware. One key difference is that these installers also ask for root access; unlike the default install of Firefox and Chrome which install in userspace and not root.

I also tried DuckDuckGo and while the results are formatted differently and the Google ranking in the results were higher they also provided links to 3rd parties although some are more reputable than the others.

One strongest features of all three browsers is that they install and run in userspace. If the installer asks for your password then there is something very wrong going on.

This alone makes a strong case for factory bootstraping of key tools and brands.

Back in the day Microsoft defended itself and it's business practices by making it difficult to install 3rd party browsers like Mozilla. Today everyone loses. An Apple genius recently recommended that I disable FileVault; not because it was bad but because failure created product perception problems. This sort of malware, misuse and misappropriation of free/open software is going to hurt everyone.

**Sandboxed apps is one solution and may or may not be a good remedy but thanks for trying. On the other hand there is something to be said for the ChromeOS approach too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…