Skip to main content

NodeJS servers to support one page aps

I've tried a number of NodeJS servers [expressjs, sails, meteor, hapi]. I cannot say that they are all completely different or that they are completely the same. They are what they are.

  • expressjs comes from a long line of connect experience.
  • sails feels a lot like rails with some really cool features like auto subscription, socket.io, and the browser console.
  • meteor is a complete departure from the others. It's a complete server but it's also a complete platform. More so than the others. It's also it's downside. It already includes bootstrap but what version? Then there is the customizations too.
  • hapi is an odd duck. It's like a traditional app server but then they go a long way to help you handle some of the edge cases like client ans server side cache with a simple config setting. But then when you look at the add-ons they are so very incomplete.
The documentation and useful examples are another pain point:
  • expressjs the documentation is just barely adequate when supplemented with the code. But then the examples could be better.
  • sails has a great screencast but the documentation is missing some key elements like how to deal with static docs. While you're likely to figure it out you may feel abandoned.
  • meteor requires a magic decoder ring to make sense of it all. For example "Meteor gathers all your JavaScript files, excluding anything under the client and public subdirectories,..." which suggested that I needed a public folder in order to render a more traditional page.
  • hapi has plenty of words but only covers a fraction of their server. When you install the module you'll see buckets of modules installed and just not enough to read.
One thing I did not like about meteor is that it did not use NPM.  Not that NPM is without warts but at least it's consistent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…