Skip to main content

My Next Framework

I have been reading everything there is to read on the different architectures for building scalable web applications. The challenges are numerous. For example; the benefits of client-side one-page application is offset by the fact that they lowest entry point smart phone and similar appliances are not as performant as they once were. But then millions of uniques a day might have a similar effect on the server-side of the architecture.

So what to do?

(a) by building a proper idempotent stateless REST layer that can either be exposed via an API layer or buried inside your domain would seem to be a good starting point. This is going to let you scale the backend separately from the frontend with few wasted cycles in between.

(b) when building the one-page app use tools that limit your exposure whether the rendering takes place inside your servers or is pushed to the client. For example using template tools like mustache which are supported in a number of different languages like C#, Go, Java, Ruby... etc. But the real trick might be to implement on JavaScript and use NodeJS. But keep in mind that transitioning from a one-page client app. to a server-side app is not without it's challenges. Currently there are no tools that span the gap; you're on your own there.
My latest endeavor has me capturing system events from applications, forwarding to graphite, rendering results, capturing test case configuration and test results, and many other build and test metrics. I'm never going to be overrun with users but since I need to expose REST calls for the various systems to publish to... it made the most sense. Also since we are all using state of the art computers the only issue might be lag time to download the javascript. (which is not really an issue all things considered). One additional proof of concept is providing data for status board (from

So for now this looks like the simplest way to divide the work. Test the functionality, accuracy and scale. Add features without dependency on having to update the entire source tree.

If the #1 rule is DRY then the #2 rule is KRIS (Keep RIsk Small).


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…