Skip to main content

Self organizing teams are costly in other areas

The Agile process is suppose to accomplish a number of things. Sustainable development is only one of them and that truly depends on the team. The challenge, however, is that "team" is not a static thing. Employees leave and join teams regularly. Whether by normal attrition or because of success in the business and the anticipated or realized workload. Sometimes it's a matter of cross training members in other teams that could benefit from knowing more about the whole instead of just a few parts.

But one of the tenants of Agile is that the teams are supposed to be self organizing and that suggests that teams are self regulating as well as adapting the process as the team sees subtle or obvious customization. And it is this customization of the Agile process that I'm concerned about. For example when you are RUP trained you can be interchanged from one RUP team to another so that you can concentrate on the domain specific challenges on not the internal processes.

Furthermore, since Agile teams are flat relative to traditional organizations it promotes the notion that advancement comes from moving horizontally instead of vertically. Unfortunately moving horizontally has it's challenges when moving internally and externally. It too becomes another system to game.
The only constant is change... --Issac Asimov

If you have been in this business long enough you have come to expect change as a fact of life. However, in a physics context; change causes friction, friction causes head, heat causes premature aging... etc. And let's not forget excessive heat. So the point I'm circling around is that Agile is it's own worst enemy. Yes the glossary is fairly similar but the execution is not guaranteed.

Comments

  1. That's true but why do you describe yourself as "Agile" high volume payment systems?

    Agile is just a scam. Iterative and incremental are what drives agile.

    Maybe you should become post-agile?

    PA

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not using Agile in the way that you think. I'm Agile as in Ninja-like. However, Agile Process Management is not a scam as there are some good ideas, however, it borrows very heavily from other process improvement and management systems and so it should be more appropriately named... where the SCAM comes from is that APM practitioners (and company sponsors) have spent so much time, money and effort learning the process they refuse to acknowledge that it was a mistake. And that's where the scam comes from.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How about nimble then? Re other comments check my recent postings relative to agile as a scam

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…