Skip to main content

Having worked with driptiles. metro is interesting but has limited usecases

The description that follows is derived from my experience with droptiles. What makes droptiles interesting is that it is browser implementation of the metro interface as generally described by Microsoft for Windows 8. I cannot begin to determine what sort of accuracy there is between the two but it is interesting to use and modify.

The way droptiles implements the individual tiles is effectively that of a porthole on a cruise ship. (a) you can see out the window at the limited and effectively prescribed view, (b) if you want to see more you have to get off the ship.

The tiles on droptiles are simple views that you allow the user to see, They are implemented in fixed sizes but can be anything you can render with private css and/or Twitter's Bootstrap. Optionally, the user can add tiles from the "store" and the user can move tiles from one section to another or within a section. (some of the auto placement is a little awkward and buggy.)  Also, if implemented the user can click on a tile and the website that is linked to the tile will take over the current browser tab inside an iframe. (The iframe is to give the user a way to get back to the main droptile dashboard).

So in summary you either have the dashboard up in fullscreen or you have the app you are using in fullscreen. This is ok for someone who might be a casual user. Possibly someone at home on the couch that is watching TV and casually looking at RSS feeds or even email blurbs. It might be useful to someone in network operations or some other role where the main job responsibility is to observe and report. But as a programmer, knowledge worker, or just someone who might perform word-processing all day... the droptile metro interface is not going to add any real value.

So I wonder whether the ongoing complaints about Metro are well deserved or not. I wonder whether or not the start button is really necessary or not. Will wonders never cease? Given the size, depth and breadth of the average user's program files folder I wonder if this is good for the desktop? It's certainly great for their phones!


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…