Skip to main content

Second and third thoughts about "the cloud"

I've been running iStatMenus and Little Snitch for quite a while. When I first started using these tools I wanted to know what my computer and the installed software was doing.  That included everything from Apple as well as the commercial and open source software I had installed. In a way Little Snitch was a dual authentication for outbound connections and iStat gave me useful indication of the resources currently in play.

Now that I have installed Mountain Lion and Little Snitch 3 (beta) I'm starting to watch my system more closely again. The first thing that caught my attention is that Google Chrome, Google Drive and DropBox are chatty. Yes, I have a few extensions installed on my browser like Google Voice,, Mail Notify, GTalk, Google Calendar, Google Task. What the hell are they doing?
If silence were golden then network silence should be platinum.

When I quit Chrome, Drive and DropBox there are still examples of apps that are talking to the network. But Why?  I just wrote an article this morning where I talk about installing non-commercial applications in userspace or adminspace and the possible side effects. So what are the lessons learned here?

(a) if you're using a cloud application then you are going to consume bandwidth and probably more than you want. So while that MacBook Air would ideal in the cloud the battery will not likely last, network costs because the apps do not know when you are on battery or using mobile tethering minutes.

(b) we, as consumers, have no idea what is actually being passed back and forth. It is not unreasonable to consider that Google could be using some sort of bittorrent-like system to seed future chome downloads and that's why I see such high usage.

(c) while my wifi bandwidth is still much higher than the ISP bandwidth it still seems that I'm saturated someplace. Even copying files from one system to the next on the same subnet seems constrained.

(d) What does not make any sense at all is the number of servers that Chrome connects to. It's not like it's one or two but is seems that there might be several dozen. What the heck are they doing? Some of it might be the different apps, but why? (that was rhetorical).

Sun's vision that the network is the computer is coming into vogue and it's starting to cost us in privacy and our wallets.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…