Skip to main content

Linux Distros are Becoming More Like Windows...

It's hard to admit but it's happening and you can see it in the likes of Ubuntu 12.04 desktop (and earlier releases too) as well as Fedora 17. The first indicator was the need for advanced 3D video drivers in order to support the new desktop goodies. Sound like Aero/Glass yet?

This morning while I was updating a client's Ubuntu 12.04 server was that there seemed to be a request to convert /etc/resolv.conf to /etc/resolveconf. This might seem like a subtle change but when you read the manpage for resolvconf you realize that your server is going to be running a few more daemons that you previously didn't need. (I do not know enough about resolvconf and I'm certain the author would not be wasting our time but it feels wrong that we need a daemon where the traditional methods worked fine)

I watched a talk recently where the speaker pointed me to this doc. The interesting point is that the original Unix distro was only 10K lines of code. This speaks volumes considering the millions of LOC that are in the current distros. You did not get a GUI in 10K but it was a functioning OS. My complaint is that the dependency on current hardware and daemonizing everything that moves feels like a move away from the Linux roots.

PS: This will likely widen the splinter between the *nix and the BSD groups.

Comments

  1. All that seems to be left are less well-known Linux distros and Ubuntu server. If you purchase Canonical support for a production environment, at least that is good support.

    ReplyDelete
  2. slackware was always a favorite of mine. i have not followed it in years. i would have liked to use it as the base for a POS i deployed but driver support was weak. i ended up using ubuntu 10 LTS. i an not sure what the next version will be based on as the hardware vendor is pulling it's linux support.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…