Skip to main content

Linux Desktop Proliferation - Attack of the Memes.

Oracle recently announced it's own version of Linux. I'm not sure if the intent is to capture some desktops or if it is truly meant to operate in the datacenter. Oracle has a history of certifying it's database to run on particular operating systems. I think this is partly because they want to make certain that their software licensing system remains in tack after installation and partly because they want to keep customer service operating costs to a minimum and if the OS is understood then the costs should be predictable.

Another Linux distro, Scientific Linux, peaked my interest this month.  It was functional, quick, handled multiple displays nicely... generally modern. What bothered me about it was it's construction. It was effectively RedHat with a modest increase in default packages (which I'm certain could have been installed manually or with Puppet or Chef).

So before I head of on some tangent I'll cut to the conclusion. Neither of these groups/companies are worth the visit. Use the Oracle distro if you're using the Oracle stack but not for general computing. I do not think they are adding any real value other than they understand their stack the best.

As for SL. They are not adding any real value to the experience. It would be easier for them to get/use institutional licenses or even a custom distro directly from RedHat. There is nothing that SL needs or wants that is not already available out there. Since SL is a funded project... once the Higgs-Bosen is discovered and confirmed I could imagine that the various colliders will either power down or rather all the money is going to head toward the next great adventure. Something like SL would likely see itself defunded in the first round; but that's just my opinion.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…