Skip to main content

Editing in the cloud - web based IDEs etc

The challenge: Last month I tried an experiment.  Could I be productive writing code exclusively on my MacBook Air 11". While the results were positive I wanted to get back to my 24" monitor. It has not changed my need to mouse of cmd+tab around the active apps but I can see more, specially now that I have a second monitor for things like IM and Skype. What I do not like about this configuration is that I'm using BBEdit and editing files on my remote dev server via SFTP. And knowing how unstable an internet connection can be; not to mention that BBEdit has no collaborative features so if I edited the file on a second system there is a chance I could jank the whole thing up. Of course I could use GitHub or BitBucket as a proxy, however, there are plenty of use-cases there that is not practical and that means keeping the dirty laundry around longer than I want.

Ideal Solution: I'd like to see a chrome or safari plugin that uses their sync capability to keep my credentials secure and then an offline editor plugin with collaborative functionality similar to subethaedit. And while I'd really like to edit the files on my servers via SFTP or FTP/S I'd also like access to my DropBox instance.

(the coding monkeys have not done anything in over a year. subethaedit is clearly sub-par as an editor but it would not take much to make it a leader... maybe before macromates?)

Less than ideal: At first shiftedit looked like a potential alternative. It was not a perfect fit but it offered some features that I liked. But when I started to read the bottom line 3pt font... they keep my dropbox uid/password on their servers. Are you kidding me?  Codeanywhere was another alternative. Their website touts very similar functions that shiftedit does. One interesting feature is that they will let you resume a current editing session and syncs the edit sessions across the different tools like chrom, ipad etc... nice. But again, the bad news is that they require a user account. I have a support request into them in order to get a sense of what they keep or proxy on my behalf.

I just don't get it: Many of these cloud services companies are simply mashups of different cloud services. That's easy.  What is hard is keeping all of these mashups from becoming a severe risk. Think about this... if the likes of GlobalPayments and similar businesses that are wrapped in a veil of PCI requirements, implementation and audits including obfuscation of card numbers and account numbers with very robust encryption including duckput... what makes you think the likes of the cloud mashup of the day is (a) protecting your data adequately (b) and even scarier is not simply a trojan of sorts. Once these mashups have access to your account they can read it all, not just the files you designate.

So pick and choose VERY carefully.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…