Skip to main content

Why is middle management on the decline again?

I really hate this subject because it effects me directly. Back when Reagan was President we had a huge recession. As a result middle management was all but obliterated from the middle corporate America as management thought this was the way to survive. And we learned two important lessons from this reaction. (1) recession almost turned into depression and corporate America was almost erased (2) many middle managers spawned successful startup businesses. (the two are not offsetting even with the dot com boom and bust)

Now, it seems, that we are in economic hard times again and whether it's a recession or depression is for future economists, however, I do know that middle management is being erased again; and top managers are calling it lean or agile. As a result the execs are making more money (as part of their "incentive" packages) and entry level positions have become highly competitive as the job market shrinks without rational stimulation. I wish that it was a fair competition but it's not. It favors the young person. Not because they are smarter, faster, knowledgable, malleable, "agile" or even efficient but because they are cheaper. They do not have houses, cars, families, college tuition, electricity, water, heat or A/C. And of course retirement considerations.

Top-down total-agile-management might work in the EU where just about everything is socialized and retirement assured. But here in the US, where every 2 to 4 years we talk about how bankrupt the federal retirement system is, this obliteration of middle management and a genuine career path is paramount. Companies that do not support a middle management risk losing their knowledge base, fail to mentor or apprentice their line of succession, and are only interested in the short term benefits.

So my message to all senior and 'C' level executives. Start thinking about your company as if it were to exist for another 200 years and stop thinking about your own personal legacy. If you take care of the future then the future will take care of you.

Comments

  1. Well it's a good point and also the vast importation of labor feeds into that quite nicely.

    The problem is that the incentives are usually stock based, and people cash out before the damage is noticable.

    They don't care if the company goes belly up in 2 years if they can sell their shares for a huge profit before then.

    I blame the rise of electronic stock trading as a huge factor in this.

    In the old days, people bought and held shares -- for many years.. If the company went BK 5 years later, that would be a big deal.

    Now, people can trade 24x7....whatever this quarters results is, thats a boost.

    Payroll is the largest expense of most businesses, the only way to boost profits in the short term is to cut people, or cut salaries, and yes, the boys at the top profit while everyone else suffers.

    Capitalism gone awry. I don't think socialism is the answer, but clearly something must be done to reign in self destructive capitalism

    Jordan

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder what it takes to become an e-Trader (not to be confused with ETrade)?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I dunno.... if you want to know more about day traders get on the IRC channel #invest on efnet and ask them... a lot of independent day traders on there.. or did you mean something else by e-trader?
    Jordan

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm talking about high velocity trading. It cannot be free to join and if it's not then what is the cost? And what is the message protocol? Wouldn't it be interesting to setup a mock exchange that could simulate the various exchanges on the level of a simcity as sort of a training ground.

    I think that this sort of trading is or was as complicated as google's revenue stream before they went public. Now practically anyone can do it if you have the money and momentum... they just have this huge leap ahead of everyone else... but even duckduckgo is giving it a try.

    So why not trading?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…