Skip to main content

What is middle management good for?

Rosabeth Moss Kanter recently wrote an article for the Harvard Business Review. She has a number of views on the subject of management hierarchy and I think she misses the point. In response...

First of all, as an example, middle management is where executives and upper management get to take off their training wheels. There is a reason why Donald Trump has an apprentice program and not just the TV show. There is a reason why government does pretty much the same. I would not expect some undergrad with a polisci degree to run the country. Without middle management the revolving door at Yahoo and HP would become a game of chutes and ladders. (The last thing I want to see is all upper management graduating with Harvard MBA and no job experience)

Second, it's not the first time that corporate america has ejected middle management in the last 30 years. The last time was because of the recession/depression or whatever it was. This covered manufacturing and technology companies. And in the end it was a huge mistake. There was so much intellectual property in middle management that companies took years trying to retool for the next cycle.

Thirdly, your post was tweeted by an agile coach. I respect this person very much. And his tweet of just the article's title suggested to me that there is an agile twist to this as most agile teams and companies are very flat. This sort of suggests that a rank and file worker at a company that practices agile from top to bottom is (1) a pawn to be replaced (2) expendable (3) not really going to advance in responsibility because the ratio of workers to managers is so high.

Finally, this article suggests that we (in the US) are moving from a capitalistic society to socialistic one and while there are some benefits in both; the problem is that we are democratic capitalists. We want to win the lottery. We want the new shiny toys, cars and houses. So until Madison Ave stops selling gold plated cell phones, and MTV stops selling gold plated teeth and "cribs" and until Donald trump moves into the 4/3 next door to me ...

Mrs Kanter I appreciate that you took the time to write this article but I see it as a warning of yet another economic disaster.

PS: There was a period of economic growth after the last recession because many of those middle managers started their own companies. I'm not certain that can happen again. I'm just an out of work programmer with 25 years experience and with my dependents I need middle management responsibility and salary; I cannot compete with high school and college grads because they do not have houses, cars, families, insurance payments and so on.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…