Skip to main content

Vizio is on the move

[Update 2012-06-26] Vizio just announced "CoStar". It's a GoogleTV appliance that costs $99USD and has all of the basic features like video and radio from the various media suppliers. The price for the device is inline with AppleTV now it's a matter of comparing the cost of the media.

It's been a news story recently. Vizio, an American company and maker of reasonably priced TVs, is branching into making computers. Their laptops and all-in-one desktops are aesthetically designed with plenty of "out of the box supported" modern features(no custom device drivers) and none of the sponsor-ware. Which leads me to a number of concerns:

(1) Is the $899 starting price tag really the best price? If you look at the TV market and compare; Vizio was never at the utter bottom but their prices and quality make them onto any gift-list I imagine. However, the price is closer to Sony and Lenovo instead of Gateway and eMachines. I would like to get a hands on to see it in action. I would also like to know if *nix or *BSD are viable.

(2) While the OS is supposed to be an out of the OEM box install of Windows I find myself being skeptical. WIthout actually having a machine to evaluate I could not tell, however, one of the common themes over the last few years has been the general move to social data capture. If the general consumer had any idea how much information was included in the "phone home" feature of many of their installed and commercial applications they would be concerned. On the one hand this might have offset the cost of the software but what is the real cost? That's another story.

(3) Just how functional is an OEM install of Windows? My recollection is not much. Once you get past the deeply embedded Internet Explorer and some of the basic Control Panel, MineSweeper, Calc, Remote Desktop, NotePad and a dozen other tools and utilities you're done. I would hope that, by now, Microsoft is offering some Express versions of it's software "by default" as part of the OEM install in order to compete with OSX. On the one-hand I'd rather install them separately so that I could decide whether or not to install MS Office but on the other hand when considering a computer like this for Grandma/pa I'd rather complete their install with as little friction as possible.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…