Skip to main content

integration, convergence, happy desktop - what's next?

I'm banging away on my development system; installing Fedora-17 and VMware tools for kicks, watching some YouTube, and skimming some emails, reconfiguring iChat, iCal, Skype, MailApp and Sparrow; and thinking about what would make a real productive desktop. Windows, Mac, Linux, *BSD, console-mode, proprietary GUI, X-Windows, is there a cloud or virtual platform that makes sense, what about ChromeOS, ChromeBook?

There are just so many brands, platforms, tools, development environments, and purpose built tools that it's almost impossible to be a user and a developer at the same time.

As a user, project manager, and business person; I need access to word processors, spreadsheets, accounting software, some purpose built applications for reporting, IM.

As an architect, developer, testing; I need access to the command line, the necessary desktop development tools like IDEs, access to various databases, remote systems, IRC.

The list goes on and on, but the truth is that there is no one "slim" platform that offers all of this goodness of which there are 3 and a half platforms. (1) Microsoft Windows + SkyDrive + Office (2) Apple OSX + iCloud + iWork (3) Chrome or ChromeOS + Google Drive + Google Apps. (3.5) is OpenOffice.

Microsoft, Apple and Google all have their own hardware platform. Microsoft tried some privacy limiting moves a few years ago and was slammed. Apple did it and people did not seem to notice. And with Google people don't seem to care.

Microsoft and Apple offer standalone apps for the different desktop apps where Google offers a virtual separate app for each function, however, they load lightning fast and they perform as needed most of the time. OpenOffice is built on Java and as fast as the JVM is supposed to be OpenOffice is just not there.

But when I put on my developer hat the Google platform is more of a handcuff than a tool. Only Microsoft and Apple offer reasonable toolsets. Google will need to offer a sandbox for development if it's platform is going to get the attention of devs.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…