Skip to main content

BitBucket vs GitHub

I tell you... what a hard decision to make! I cannot decide which tool is better for my DVCS needs. Clearly the toolset is deeper if I go with GitHub. Not only does GH have lots of tools but there are plenty of 3rd party tools too. Some of the slicker GUIs include Tower for OSX. On the downside; if you have to install the CLI client it can get squirrely  because there are a few different languages in the dependency tree although I've never actually had a problem deploying it.

On the other hand, the pricing for BitBucket is better when you consider my shop. I'm "mostly" a sole contributor for my company and having an unlimited number of private and public repositories is reasonable and cost effective. The other thing I really like is that the CLI is written in python and mostly python.  I think there is some native C code that compiles but I cannot be sure. I know that it installs in a ver stable fashion.

As for which has better. I'm not certain. I know that they are both quality applications. The companies behind them are strong. Both are widely used. Both are integrated into the GO tools which I really like. Some people talk about branching and merging and the differences there. I'm not sure I care. I've rarely had to branch/merge.

One last note. GitHub has added some sort of subversion(SVN) framework to their platform and BitBucker has added a GitHub framework.  I'm not sure if this is an alias type of thing or if it is a real deployment.

Sorry I cannot offer any solutions. I use them all and I'm still trying to reduce my footprint.

PS: an interesting thing I just noticed.  The initials for GitHub are GH and the shortcut for BitBucket -> mercurial is HG.  HG <=> GH  ?? Fun!

PS: two additional mentions. MacHG is a good OSX GUI for HG. SourceTree works on both HG and GH.


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…