Skip to main content

Python is Better than Perl - The Killer App.

Back on July 5th, 2011, I wrote a post about how perl was better than python. Since then I have a new opinion. Partly because of the cruft I received from the Mojolicious community. It's sad because perl is a great language and the CPAN community is also very strong. That a few curmudgeons can ruin it for the rest is sad. As an editorial comment they are only hurting the language they are protecting so much.

One of the biggest chalenges with languages like perl, python and ruby is that they are being installed as part of the base OS. Specially in most linux distros. (perl has been there from as early as I can remember) Recently python and ruby have been added to the basic install. This is not a bad thing but these languages are under constant development and they are constantly evolving making current applications obsolete or non-functioning.

This is also a HUGE challenge in the development cycle when dependencies are constantly moving and yet developers need to make progress. S recently I started spending time with virtualenv. I'm also using workon a virtualenv wrapper.

In the perl article I was all gaga over CPAN. The python folks have PyPi which does a great job. The best part is that submitting your own packages can be pretty simple if you use the modern-package-template and some of the built-in tools. My sense is that the CPAN can be brutal to submit.

The best part of the virtualenv is that you can specify the version of python, install specific versions of packages, and basically encapsulate the entire application environment away from the base OS version. The next step is going to be deploying with a virtualenv install in production but for the moment the current challenges have been met.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…