Skip to main content

PhotoStream is not DropBox

It's fine and dandy that "we" tend to press the AGREE button for every update to the EULA changes that Microsoft, Apple or just about every vendor produces or makes. We have become accustomed to the notion that someone is reading this crap and if it's too radical or restrictive someone else is going to complain when there is a genuine conflict.

I'm still having trouble making an offsite backup of my family photo albums. My wife has taken over 20K pictures since we first started dating and I introduced her to digital photography. Add the video and we have almost 300GB and according to CrashPlan and Bitcasa my upload is going to take months even at full throttle.

Since PhotoStream storage is not counted as part of the disk usage I thought it would be a great place to store our pictures. I'd have to find an alternative for the video but for the moment this was the plan.

But when you launch iPhoto for the first time and select the PhotoStream view, the splash screen says it all. "keeps the last 30 days". Unfortunately Apple has lost yet another manual and so there is no way to know exactly what that means. And taken in the context of more "air" and iOS type computers coming from apple I'm just not certain I know what the process is going to be in order to actually preserve the pictures.

PS: 30 days is ok if the family shares the same iCloud account and you just want to share instantly. But it's going to suck when it comes to battery life.

Comments

  1. [...] was starting to retry Apple’s iCloud again… as I mentioned (sort of). Anyway I started tweaking my email settings again and that’s when I started to [...]

    ReplyDelete
  2. [...] many hundreds of GB of data it can take months to seed one of these cloud services as I recently commented. And each of these services offer different features that might fit different [...]

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…