Skip to main content

I Want A Skype Replacement

I'm not happy with Skype. There I said it. But like many things in life I do not have much of a choice. The first time I used Skype I was in Barcelona Spain on my honeymoon and I needed to call our family to let them know we arrived before we headed out.

So it cost me $4 for the hotel wifi, and $5 for one day of Skype... and I was able to make one phone call that was interrupted 5 times by either bad wifi or Skype service. I'll never know. I should have used my cell phone thanks to hindsight.

Now I use Google Voice for as much as I can. There are still a few challenges there. It's decent quality but in order to keep the cellphone minutes down I'm forced to use Google Talk via the browser because they do not have a wifi client for the iPhone.

What I'd really like, now, is a Skype online number.  That's a number that someone else, presumably landline or mobile, in order to reach me wherever my Skype connection is active. The problem is I cannot tell what the pricing is. I cannot tell where the discounts are and I cannot tell what the best plan is for me.

The most annoying part is that they do not offer any sales support beyond their website and FAQ. I tried to enter into the system for a callback for a business-class service. They promised a callback, but all I got was an email. Granted there was a phone number at the bottom but I was not going to call it because they promised me a call.

Looking at their website they promised me a 50% discount on the online number but every time I went into my cart it cost $60/yr.  Where was the discount?  Then I found a small +++ reference.  There is a catch.  You have to purchase a subscription.

So after the 12-month (prepaid) subscription the cost is $2.50/month. But I still have to pay for an online number. Since I cannot buy both at the same time I have no idea if they are going to honor the advertised 50% discount. But here is something else I noticed.  I have a $10 balance on my Google Voice account and my Skype account.  I have not made a call that would cost anything ... So what is this all good for?


Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).


I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…