Skip to main content

Software development in the cloud

Software development is about to change forever. Certainly the people at Cloud9 have recognized that and so have a dozen-ish web and desktop collaborative IDE projects (see wikipedia).

I recently purchased a MacBook Air. The small 11" version with 64GB of SSD. It's not a lot of memory or disk but it is enough if all I want to be is a "user".  But as soon as I put on my programmer hat, it's not enough.

Partly because of the screen size but more importantly the tools. Sure my mac is a general purpose computer but my clients and applications are not. From one project to the next I can end up with completely different tools requirements. For any set of projects I can be required to use widely different versions of Java, python, perl, ruby or even erlang. And then it gets crazy as I try to handle the different versions of and dependencies of libraries.

Additionally, as I get ready to package and deploy the application(s) it wickedly hard to deploy without picking up unwanted dependencies. Specially when the dependencies run deep. It's always better to deploy on a fresh machine.

The good news is that most development heavy companies have already noticed this. They tend to use cloned drives when giving employees new computers so that they do not have to install each application individually.  Just clone a drive and off you go.  In many cases you can provide Dell a drive image and they'll manufacture a set of laptops for you. It's even more fun when they encrypt the entire volume. So your IT staff does not have to lift a finger other than to deliver and plug-in your new computer. Many of those same companies use operations' centric computers running something like VMWare to slice off developer systems that look the same. This way everyone has the same starting point.

So as we independents and SOHO business owners move forward we need to consider this. Spend more money on upgraded networking at the office and remote locations. Provide commodity hardware. Move everything to the cloud and replicate/duplicate everything.

PS: I did some math.  As much as I like my MBA, it cost me $999. Amortized over 5 years that comes to $16 per month. For just about $11/mo I can get a reasonable dev server at rackspace. It's still expensive and I have no idea what their expenses are it might actually be reasonable.  For my $11/mo I get a dedicated server with shell access with a public and private IP address. I get plenty of network bandwidth for development. And the system runs 24x7; unlike my laptop which I turn off at night.

So my recommendations for rackspace. Bring the price down and open up some cloud services even if they are repackaged and bundled google services. You could capture a huge market if you had a proper workbench for different vertical markets.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…