Skip to main content

Business Class Communication With Remote Employees

At the moment I'm sitting at my desk in my home office and I have several programs open in order to communicate with me and I hate the fact that I need so many applications and so many duplicates. And it's not that they are bad applications but they are all bloated, have difference security models, and then there is the elitism of some of them.

Here's the rundown:

  • Mailplane is my regular eMail client for all of the gmail accounts. I currently have nearly 20 accounts.

  • I use iChat connected to 3 IM accounts

  • I use Adium for IRC

  • Skype and Skype Chat

  • Google Voice (it's connected to my MailPlane interface and my Chrome browser by extension)

  • A client of mine was using Mio so I installed it once too

  • And then there is FaceTime on my desktop and on my iPad

  • go to my pc


When you look at my desktop most of the apps that are running are actually idle and not running at all. Just think about all that screen real-estate, memory, CPU and network resources that they are consuming. How can this get more normalized? As a business owner and user I want:

  1. simple and functional applications even if they are not integrated

  2. secure so that my competitors are not listening in

  3. not off putting

  4. complete so that I can even screen share quickly

  5. reasonable cost


And something that is compelling enough that I don't have to worry about keeping those other applications around any more. Can't we all just get alone?

Comments

  1. We are becoming a virtual workforce that is never disconnected from work due to the wonders of mobile technology. I can appreciate your post on connecting the technology dots, it is amazing how a room can become command center with computers, smartphones and tablets, and even a phone which is so 20th century.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

UPDATE 2017-10-30: With gratitude the CoreOS team has provided updated information on their pricing, however, I stand by my conclusion that the effective cost is lower when you deploy monster machines. The cost per node of my 1 CPU Intel NUC is the same as a 96 CPU server when you get beyond 10 nodes. I'll also reiterate that while my pricing notes are not currently…

eGalax touch on default Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

I have not had success with the touch drivers as yet.  The touch works and evtest also seems to report events, however, I have noticed that the button click is not working and no matter what I do xinput refuses to configure the buttons correctly.  When I downgraded to ubuntu 10.04 LTS everything sort of worked... there must have been something in the kermel as 10.04 was in the 2.6 kernel and 4.04 is in the 3.x branch.

One thing ... all of the documentation pointed to the wrong website or one in Taiwanese. I was finally able to locate the drivers again: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html (it would have been nice if they provided the install instructions in text rather than PDF)
Please open the document "EETI_eGTouch_Programming_Guide" under the Guide directory, and follow the Guidline to install driver.
download the appropriate versionunzip the fileread the programming manual And from that I'm distilling to the following: execute the setup.sh answer all of the questio…

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…