Skip to main content

Harrah's in Lake Tahoe Nevada SUCKS

My in-laws have been coming to this casino/hotel for well over 25 years. I have been tagging along for almost 10 years. On this New Years Eve at 9:15p, local time, security decided to deny us (4 adults and 3 minor children) passage through the casino to get to the elevators. This was the same exit we had gone through 30 minutes earlier and now security forced us to walk around the building to the valet entrance. And when we attempted to get from the lobby of the hotel to the elevator we were stopped by another security person who [a] asked us for our room key [b] explained that minors were not permitted on the casino floor.... but to get to the elevators one needs to pass 6 slot machines.

The security person was adamant that it was Nevada State Law, however, after reviewing the Nevada Gaming Control Board regulations there is nothing in it about "passing thru" or "right of way". I specifically deals with the operations of the business and participants.... nothing about walking through.

Let me be clear, there may or may not actually be a state law, however, the casino has made a point not to enforce that law or regulation the other 364 days and 20 hours of the year. In fact it was not enforced last year or the year before. Chances are that this was a hotel rul that they decided to make or enforce since the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino opened across the street and is attracting a whole new crowd.

This will likely be my last year here. There are so many nicer places to go.

UPDATE: I spoke to a supervisor in the security office. The explanation I was given was that the decision to prevent minors from walking through the casino was a "house rule" and that the over ambitious security guard must have been a temp worker who was unfamiliar with the rules.

Popular posts from this blog

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

Weave vs Flannel

While Weave and Flannel have some features in common weave includes DNS for service discovery and a wrapper process for capturing that info. In order to get some parity you'd need to add a DNS service like SkyDNS and then write your own script to weave the two together.
In Weave your fleet file might have some of this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=/opt/bin/weave run --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
In sky + flannel it might look like:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=docker run -d --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStartPre=etcdctl set /skydns/local/ncx/bob '{"host":"`docker inspect --format '{{ .NetworkSettings.IPAddress }}' bob`","port":8080}' ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
I'd like it to look like this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=skyrun --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
That's the intent anyway. I'm not sure the exact commands will work and that's partly why we…