Skip to main content

Base weight 8.8 pounds and SOL given up but so close

I've officially given up Super Ultralight. To recap why: too expensive to manage 30 degree temperature swings. And so I have decided to work on Ultralight hiking and I'm about there.


I decided to get a new pack. It's a sports pack with no padding, frane or support. It cannot weigh more than 100g even though this model seems to be made from some sort of canvas or robust material.

Included in this pack: hammock, tarp and stakes, 2/4 mattress, bivy, micro-towels and schemog, poncho, water system, first aid, fire kit, EDC kit, and a pillow. The total weight is 8.8 pounds. Once I've added 1L of water and 1.5 pounds of food I'll be at about 12 pounds. The pack feels nice as the cord is slightly padded but some padding would be nice or maybe cutting the padding down a little.

And then an amazing thing happened:


I swapped out the 2GoSystems with the SOL bivy; removed the extra towels; dropped the tarp in favor of the poncho/tarp, removed the fire kit and trimmed my first aid kit to tape and Imodium. I might actually be able to get to SUL weights if I dropped the mattress and reduced the amount of soap, sunscreen, bug spray, sanitizer, use aquamira tabs instead of drops or premix drops, and removed the sawyer.

Oh so close.

UPDATE: while I thought Super UltraLight (SUL) was all about money I was kinda wrong. The kit below offers some accommodation as it weighs in at 4 pounds and yet it's not a favorite.



  • Since the hammock was removed I had to add the tyvek ground sheet. So where ever I plan to sleep the ground has to be dry.
  • I've also decided to forego my Sawyer and Aquamira drops for aquamira tabs. The tabs require no less than 4 hours prep time.
  • Even though I've removed the first aid kit from the pack only a fraction would be added back in.
  • I did add a head net but that could turn into a pyramid net.
  • I might be able to restore the hammock and remove the tyvek an use drops instead of tabs and still be under 5 pound.

This pack is officially 4.5 pounds. Now there is room for a second pair of socks and maybe a mosquito net.

UPDATE: Lastly I decided to see what would happen if I replaced the hammock with my tent. The net result is 4 lbs 10 oz and it was just a little larger as the tent is not compressed. I also changed the mattress and that added about 70g.


I still think SUL might not be safe or practical depending where you are hiking. Ultralight makes a lot more sense and in my case since I think I might need both a hammock and a tent I could easily stay UL.

Popular posts from this blog

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

Weave vs Flannel

While Weave and Flannel have some features in common weave includes DNS for service discovery and a wrapper process for capturing that info. In order to get some parity you'd need to add a DNS service like SkyDNS and then write your own script to weave the two together.
In Weave your fleet file might have some of this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=/opt/bin/weave run --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
In sky + flannel it might look like:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=docker run -d --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStartPre=etcdctl set /skydns/local/ncx/bob '{"host":"`docker inspect --format '{{ .NetworkSettings.IPAddress }}' bob`","port":8080}' ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
I'd like it to look like this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=skyrun --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
That's the intent anyway. I'm not sure the exact commands will work and that's partly why we…