Skip to main content

hard boiled egg without the boil

I've watched a number of videos where a bushcrafter makes a small hole in the top of an egg and then sets it into the warm embers of a cooling fire. I've also watched videos where users of the bush buddy or stolo stove have handled their stove while a fire was raging telling stories of how it's not hot. OK, it's hot from about 1/3rd from the bottom to the top.

So I got to thinking, can I hard boil an egg [a] without the boil and [b] without the firepit and [c] without the exploding eggs. I built this contraption to [i] chip a hole in the top and mix the contents [ii] hold the egg close to the side of my solo stove.

the contraption
There are two loops. The egg rests in the bottom loop and the top loop hold the egg in place. The rod to the right is used to poke a hole and stir the contents. The length of the down rod is also long enough to reach the grid at the bottom of the solo stove.

the contraption installed

I wish it would have worked. It usually takes 15 to 20 minutes to hard-boil and egg, however, after 30 minutes and plenty of twigs the egg was still a mess. Only about the bottom 3rd was cooked. There is a chance that some other type of radiator would have helped.

Popular posts from this blog

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

Weave vs Flannel

While Weave and Flannel have some features in common weave includes DNS for service discovery and a wrapper process for capturing that info. In order to get some parity you'd need to add a DNS service like SkyDNS and then write your own script to weave the two together.
In Weave your fleet file might have some of this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=/opt/bin/weave run --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
In sky + flannel it might look like:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=docker run -d --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStartPre=etcdctl set /skydns/local/ncx/bob '{"host":"`docker inspect --format '{{ .NetworkSettings.IPAddress }}' bob`","port":8080}' ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
I'd like it to look like this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=skyrun --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
That's the intent anyway. I'm not sure the exact commands will work and that's partly why we…