Skip to main content

hammock camping

One of the things I like about hammock camping is that they appear to be lightweight and take little room in your pack. Granted there is something to be said about the combination of materials that make up a bivy or a small 1-2 person tent that on the whole it might weight more or less the same. By the time I finish this post I hope to compare a hammock to a 1p tent.

First things first, I'll describe the requirements. capacity of 300lbs or more and mosquito netting. I'm skipping underblankets because I live in Florida and underblankets vary in their insulation factor and cost. I'll skip them. And I will make reference to any rain fly from the same manufacturer just in case.

I will be comparing:

  • Hennessey, these support 350lbs but cost from $250 to $300. Includes everything necessary. And is about 4lbs.
  • Eagles Nest Outfitter (ENO), This model supports 400lbs and comes in three sizes(single $59, double $69 and double deluxe $84). Instead of a net this model is a double with a 6 month repellent treated material $89. Straps $29 and rain fly $79. There is a treated($79) and untreated($59) bug net. (almost 4lbs)
  • Amok, the 330lbs capacity kit costs $400 and weights 4.5lbs. Amok is novel in that the body alignment is 90 degrees to the ridgeline.
  • Snugpak - 10x10 2lbs rainfly $53. Jungle Hammock supports 400lbs and costs $33 includes net. Straps $14
  • and misc Amazon Ohuhu Portable Nylon Fabric Travel Camping Hammock, 115" Long X 55" Wide, 600-Pound Capacity $17 and weight 1lb. straps $12. There other hammock manufacturers but one problem I have with amazon is prime seems to have an unfavorable cost structure. It's in there. And you never know where things are manufactured or when it will arrive.
Conclusion:

Hennessey is too expensive
Amok is expensive and non-traditional
Amazon feels too hit and miss regardless of the price
Snugpak is giving me a strange vibe. The same product has two different prices on amazon and they do not seem to sell their hammocks on their site.

So I think the winner is ENO.
OPTION 1: Single $59, fly $79, straps $29, net $50, TOTAL $220.
OPTION 2: jungle nest $99, fly $79, straps $29, TOTAL $210

The jungle nest seems like a nice idea with the integrated netting and while you can turn the hammock over you need to remove the ridgeline. On the otherhand the add-on netting can be replaced with the version that is treated and replaced when necessary. There are a number of other options that I like including the housefly.

UPDATE: ENO offers discount pricing for complete systems like this JungleLink.

Popular posts from this blog

Prometheus vs Bosun

In conclusion... while Bosun(B) is still not the ideal monitoring system neither is Prometheus(P).

TL;DR;

I am running Bosun in a Docker container hosted on CoreOS. Fleet service/unit files keep it running. However in once case I have experienced at least one severe crash as a result of a disk full condition. That it is implemented as part golang, java and python is an annoyance. The MIT license is about the only good thing.

I am trying to integrate Prometheus into my pipeline but losing steam fast. The Prometheus design seems to desire that you integrate your own cache inside your application and then allow the server to scrape the data, however, if the interval between scrapes is shorter than the longest transient session of your application then you need a gateway. A place to shuttle your data that will be a little more persistent.

(1) storing the data in my application might get me started more quickly
(2) getting the server to pull the data might be more secure
(3) using a push g…

Entry level cost for CoreOS+Tectonic

CoreOS and Tectonic start their pricing at 10 servers. Managed CoreOS starts at $1000 per month for those first 10 servers and Tectonic is $5000 for the same 10 servers. Annualized that is $85K or at least one employee depending on your market. As a single employee company I'd rather hire the employee. Specially since I only have 3 servers.

The pricing is biased toward the largest servers with the largest capacities; my dual core 32GB i5 IntelNuc can never be mistaken for a 96-CPU dual or quad core DELL

If CoreOS does not figure out a different barrier of entry they are going to follow the Borland path to obscurity.

Weave vs Flannel

While Weave and Flannel have some features in common weave includes DNS for service discovery and a wrapper process for capturing that info. In order to get some parity you'd need to add a DNS service like SkyDNS and then write your own script to weave the two together.
In Weave your fleet file might have some of this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=/opt/bin/weave run --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
In sky + flannel it might look like:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=docker run -d --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStartPre=etcdctl set /skydns/local/ncx/bob '{"host":"`docker inspect --format '{{ .NetworkSettings.IPAddress }}' bob`","port":8080}' ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
I'd like it to look like this:
[Service] . . . ExecStartPre=skyrun --net=host --name bob ncx/bob ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker attach bob
That's the intent anyway. I'm not sure the exact commands will work and that's partly why we…